Sports Betting News: NFL Team History | NFL Football Betting | College Football Betting | Baseball Betting | Basketball Betting | College Basketball Betting | Hockey Betting | Golf Betting | Tennis Betting | Auto Racing Betting | Horse Racing Betting | Soccer Betting
07/20/2007 - San Diego, CA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Chris Young outdueled fellow All-Star Cole Hamels with seven shutout innings as San Diego edged Philadelphia, 1-0, in the opener of a four-game set.
Young (9-3) gave up just two hits while striking out six and walking three. The big right-hander has not given up a run in his last three outings at Petco Park, a span of 21 innings. Young has won five straight decisions, with his last loss coming May 12 at home to St. Louis. He also lowered his ERA to a major league-best 1.85.
Brian Giles knocked in the lone run of the game with a two-out RBI double in the third inning for the Padres, who have won four of five.
"You looked at that matchup tonight, (it) turned out to be everything it was billed as," said Padres manager Bud Black. "Two All-Stars at the top of their games."
Philadelphia threatened in the ninth as Aaron Rowand walked with one out and Pat Burrell followed with a single to extend his hitting streak to 10 games. However, Padres closer Trevor Hoffman struck out both Greg Dobbs and Carlos Ruiz to nail down his 27th save of the season.
Hamels (11-5), a San Diego native, pitched seven solid innings, yielding just the one run on just two hits with three strikeouts and a walk.
Chase Utley went 2-for-4 with a double and Ryan Howard walked three times for the Phillies, who have dropped four of five.
"When Hamels pitches, I look at that as a game we got a real good shot of winning," said Phillies manager Charlie Manuel. "This was a heck of a game. We just came out on the short end of the deal."
The Padres got the only run they would need in the third inning as Geoff Blum singled, went to third on Young's sacrifice and scored on Giles' two-out double down the left field line.
Utley singled with one out in the fourth and stole second before Howard walked. Young, though, got Rowand to fly out to center and Burrell to ground into a force out to end the inning.
Utley then doubled with two outs in the sixth and Howard followed with his third walk of the game, but Rowand flied out to stop the threat.
Shane Victorino reached base in the eighth with a two-out single, but Padres reliever Heath Bell was able to get Utley to fly out to shallow left field.
Game Notes
Young has not given up a home run in 62 straight innings at home...The Phils signed first-round pick Joe Savery and designated him to Williamsport of the New York-Penn League...Padres catcher Josh Bard had his three-game suspension reduced to two games. Bard received the initial suspension after he made contact with umpire Ed Rapauno in the 11th inning of San Diego's 4-2 win over Pittsburgh on May 31. After having a home run reversed to a double, Bard charged the field to argue the call.
<< Delgado, Mets outlast Dodgers
Los Angeles, CA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Carlos Delgado hit one of three New York
home runs, and the Mets overcame 19 Los Angeles hits to beat the Dodgers,
13-9, in the opener of a four-game series.
Delgado and Ramon Castro hit consecut
<< Blake survives to reach Countrywide quarterfinals
Los Angeles, CA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Second seed James Blake needed three sets
to oust fellow American Paul Goldstein in the second round of the Countrywide
Classic on Thursday.
After Blake cruised to an easy first set win, Goldstein
<< Pierzynski, White Sox edge Red Sox
Boston, MA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - A.J. Pierzynski had three hits and knocked in
three runs, and Paul Konerko homered, as the White Sox topped the Boston Red
Sox, 4-2, in a game that started nearly two hours late due to rain.
Javier Vazquez
<< Sabathia gets win No. 13 as Indians edge Rangers
Arlington, TX (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Grady Sizemore homered and drove in a pair
of runs, and C.C. Sabathia picked up his major league leading 13th win as
Cleveland bested Texas, 7-5, in the opener of a four-game set.
Trot Nixon and Ben
Valencia inks Real Madrid's Helguera >>
Madrid, Spain (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Valencia agreed to terms with former Real
Madrid defender Ivan Helguera on Friday, signing Helguera to a three-year
deal.
The Spanish center back has been at Real Madrid since 1999, capturing three L
Oakland sputtering into second half of season >>
(Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Oakland Athletics are in dire straights right now,
having lost nine of their last 10 games. The A's are a pathetic 1-6 since
the All-Star break and now trail the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim by 11 1/2
games in the Americ
Suns ship Thomas to SuperSonics >>
Phoenix, AZ (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Phoenix Suns traded center Kurt Thomas and
two future first-round draft picks to the Seattle SuperSonics on Friday in
exchange for a future second-round pick.
Due to the trade, the Suns cleared $8 m
Angel adds to growing list of MLS awards >>
Commerce City, CO (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Red Bull New York forward Juan Pablo
Angel was named Honda Most Valuable Player of the 2007 MLS All-Star game
Thursday night at Dicks Sporting Goods Park in Commerce City. Angels game-
winning
Recently I had an email debate with an angry reader who said I did not understand "the science of oddsmaking", as he called it.
He said I was wrong for suggesting oddsmakers care about who wins or loses games.
"Oddsmakers only care about splitting the betting public 50/50 on both sides of the line and keeping the commission (a.k.a. juice)," he wrote.
He might have been right about not understanding "the science of oddsmaking". After all, I'm not an oddsmaker. That said, I stick to my assertion that oddsmakers (a.k.a. sportbooks) often do care about who wins games.
Granted, as a general rule, sportsbooks try to balance their action so that they're not exposed to big losses. However, there are times when this is difficult to pull off, regardless of how much a line has moved. There are also times when that general rule is ignored and a book pursues risk.
Generally speaking, it's safe to say the books in Vegas are risk-adverse. Unlike in the past when the wise guys ruled the town, Vegas is now corporate and the goal of most casinos is to make as much money as possible with as little risk as possible.
Thus, Vegas sportsbooks try everything in their power to balance the action. They're satisfied simply collecting the juice. But these profits are small, especially compared to the take from other casino games, namely slot machines.
Because the profits at Vegas sportsbooks are so small, you could argue that many casinos operate sportsbooks simply as a novelty to keep the tourists happy.
With a growing aversion to risk, it should come as no surprise that Vegas bookmakers have been panicking this NFL season.
Despite huge pointspreads, a disproportionate percentage of bettors are still laying their money on favorites like the Eagles, Colts, Pats and Vikings rather than the dogs (a common trend for the largely recreational bettors that visit Vegas).
And much to the dismay of the books, those favorites are finding ways to cover the thick chalk. In fact, prior to Week 7, the four teams listed above are a combined 16-2-2 (88 percent) against the spread. (The tables turned dramatically in Week 7, but more on that later.)
The result has been an early-season beating for the books, and a bonanza for bettors.
While Vegas increasingly hates risk, it's no longer a major player in the sports betting world. Most of the betting action now takes place offshore where sportsbooks are not as obsessed about balance. In fact, some books encourage exposure to risk because the rewards can be so much bigger.
Consider MySportsbook.com. On its website, the book has odds pages which actually display the amount of action it's getting on games. In other words, you can see how much action the book is taking on both sides of a pointspread, moneyline or over/under.
One look at these numbers and it's obvious MySportsbook.com does not balance every game. In fact, far from it.
Take last weekend's matchup between St. Louis and Miami. By game time on Sunday, 83 percent of the betting action at MySportsbook.com was on the Rams; only 17 percent was on Miami.
What's interesting is that MySportsbook.com opened the pointspread with Miami at +6 1/2. By game time, the spread had lowered to +5.
That goes contrary to the balancing theory. If MySportsbook.com had wanted to balance the action, it would have given Miami more points; instead, it took away 1 1/2. World Series odds are now up as well.
MySportsbook.com exposed itself to even more to risk, and rolled the dice on the underdog Dolphins. Why? I contacted a representative with the book to find out. His answer was simple.
"The line moved early based on 'smart money' from sharp players," said Jeff Gilroy, a spokesperson for the book. "We also knew from early in the week that we would need Miami, therefore (we dropped) the spread to encourage Rams money.
"At the end of the day, we liked the home team."
So the conclusion is this: MySportsbook.com respected the sharp action, and gambled that the sharp bettors had a better take on the game than the recreational bettors, who were hammering the visiting Rams.
In the end, the gamble paid off. Miami, desperate for a win in front of its home fans, pounded the overrated Rams, who are terrible on the road and even worse on grass. Final score: 31-14 Fish.
MySportsbook.com was also heavily exposed on numerous favorites in Week 7, including Philadelphia, Seattle and Denver. All three failed to cover.
The fact that sportsbooks are exposed to risk on certain games is really nothing new. The fact, that Sportsbook.com is willing to show the public where it's exposed is intriguing.
Armed with this type of information, bettors can make more educated wagers. They can get an idea where the sharp money is going and conversely where the public money is headed.
MySportsbook.com is opening up its cashbox, letting bettors look inside and challenging them to take their best shot at grabbing the cash.
To visit this online football betting got to MySportsbook.com for all your football betting odds needs. Mysportsbook.com online sportsbook accepts Visa and Mastercard credit cards.
Work left to do: Villanova, Syracuse, DePaul, West Virginia, Providence
Notre Dame and Louisville appear to have done enough to make the move, so we'll make them locks. The Cardinals, despite a modest RPI, are trending way up and have clinched at least a tie for third in the Big East, which should be more than enough with their pair of big road wins. Villanova got back to .500 and gets back to more solid footing. Syracuse got a very important road win and crippled a fellow contender in the process. West Virginia's fate could be in its hands Tuesday at Pitt.
Work left to do:
Villanova [18-9 (7-7), RPI: 21, SOS: 5] Pounded Rutgers to get back to .500. If Cats can get their last two (at UConn, vs. Syracuse), that should be enough with strong computer numbers and a host of wins away from The Pavilion. The Cats have beaten Texas and swept the Big 5 (never easy in Philly), but have a couple of losses to bubble teams (Xavier, Drexel), too. I still think they'll be OK, possibly even at 8-8.
Syracuse [20-8 (9-5), RPI: 53, SOS: 62] History says 10 wins will be plenty, but it might be hard for the Orange to get that last one with a final two vs. G'town, which is trying to win the league title, and at Villanova, which will be desperate for a W. The relative lack of nonconference heft and the weak computer numbers are still concerns, but the Orange have won four in a row and got a very, very big win at Providence on Saturday.
DePaul [16-12 (8-7), RPI: 54, SOS: 18] Beat Cincy and should get past South Florida to get to 9-7, but then what? They have beaten Kansas and Cal (right after the DeVon Hardin injury) earlier this season, but also have lost to Bradley and Purdue, among others. They'll likely need a couple of BE tourney wins, too, but we'll see ...
West Virginia [19-7 (8-6), RPI: 58, SOS: 125] The game at Pitt on Tuesday night could decide the Mountaineers' fate (barring a deep tournament run). They can still get to 9-7 in the Big East without it by beating Cincinnati, but the nine wins would be against UConn, Villanova, St. John's, South Florida, DePaul, Rutgers, Seton Hall twice and the Bearcats. Beating bubble foes is fine, but where's the beef? Outside of beating PG-less UCLA in nonconference play (still a top quality win), there's not a lot to fall back on (besides maybe NC State). WVU vs. Syracuse would be an interesting debate, as the teams don't play in the Big East regular season. WVU has the best win, but Cuse has played the much better schedule.
Providence [17-10 (7-7), RPI: 70, SOS: 33] The Friars likely saw their at-large hopes die at home in the four-point loss to Syracuse, barring an unexpected run to the Big East semis or more. The RPI, bad already, won't be helped by playing St. John's and South Florida in the final two league games.
For more March Madness odds go to MySportsbook.com
For more College Basketball betting lines go to BettingExpress.com
To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com - this sportsbook accepts credit cards.
Sports Betting News: NFL Team History | NFL Football Betting | College Football Betting | Baseball Betting | Basketball Betting | College Basketball Betting | Hockey Betting | Golf Betting | Tennis Betting | Auto Racing Betting | Horse Racing Betting | Soccer Betting